Mobilx Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs
Mobilx should have known, based on repeated objective warnings and evidence, that its transactions were more likely than not to be connected with VAT fraud, and failed to take proportionate steps such as ceasing or altering its trading methods; thus, it forfeited the right to deduct input tax.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mobilx Limited (in Administration); Respondents: Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Fraud, MTIC Fraud, Input Tax Deduction, Constructive Knowledge, Due Diligence, Supply Chain Integrity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mobilx Limited (in Administration)
Appellant
Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mobilx should have known its transactions were connected with VAT fraud
- 2 Whether the Tribunal applied the correct legal test from Kittel
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's factual findings were justified
Ratio Decidendi
Mobilx should have known, based on repeated objective warnings and evidence, that its transactions were more likely than not to be connected with VAT fraud, and failed to take proportionate steps such as ceasing or altering its trading methods; thus, it forfeited the right to deduct input tax.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mobilx's appeal against HMRC's refusal to repay input tax is dismissed.
- Mobilx forfeits the right of deduction for input tax claimed in the relevant period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment