Agents Mutual Ltd v Moginnie James Ltd [2016] EWHC 3384 (Ch) (30 December 2016)
The court has power under CPR Rule 3.1(2)(m) to permit amendment of application notices, but in this case, given the late raising of new grounds, prior procedural orders, and potential prejudice to the Defendant, amendment was not justified.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 3384 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Agents Mutual Limited; Defendant: Moginnie James Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Action / Ruling on Application to Amend Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Application to amend summary judgment application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Application Notice, Summary Judgment, Contractual Disclaimer, Case Management Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agents Mutual Limited
Claimant
Moginnie James Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Action / Ruling on Application to Amend Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a summary judgment application notice can be amended to add further grounds after issuance
- 2 Whether the court has power to permit amendment of application notices under CPR
- 3 Whether amendment should be permitted in light of prior orders and procedural history
Ratio Decidendi
The court has power under CPR Rule 3.1(2)(m) to permit amendment of application notices, but in this case, given the late raising of new grounds, prior procedural orders, and potential prejudice to the Defendant, amendment was not justified.
Court Disposition
Application to amend summary judgment application dismissed
Orders
- Application to amend summary judgment application is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment