Masood & Ors v Zahoor & Ors
All key contractual documents relied upon by SM for performance fees and share entitlement were forged; SM's claims based on those documents fail. However, SM made substantial contribution to purchase of nominee shares and is beneficial owner of KS and Mehboob shares. Loan deeds put forward by Defendants are not genuine and do not defeat SM's beneficial ownership. SM entitled to declaratory relief as beneficial owner. SM not liable for costs in Reventox action. SM entitled to damages for wrongful dismissal. MZ committed malicious falsehood by altering judgment on website; damages awarded are nominal.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sohail Masood; Claimant: Newport Financial Holding Ltd; Claimant: Newport West Financial Inc; Claimant: Mohammad Ali; Defendant: Mohammad Zahoor; Defendant: Metalsukraine Corporation Ltd; Defendant: International Steel and Tube Industries Ltd; Defendant: Azot Ltd; Defendant: Waseem Mehboob; Defendant: Parveen Saleemi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claims for contractual performance fees and share bonuses dismissed; SM declared beneficial owner of KS and Mehboob shares; SM not liable for Reventox costs; SM awarded damages for wrongful dismissal; nominal damages for malicious falsehood.
- Legal Topics
- Forgery, Perjury, Malicious Falsehood, Breach of Contract, Beneficial Ownership, Nominee Shareholding, Damages, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sohail Masood
Claimant
Newport Financial Holding Ltd
Claimant
Newport West Financial Inc
Claimant
Mohammad Ali
Claimant
Mohammad Zahoor
Defendant
Metalsukraine Corporation Ltd
Defendant
International Steel and Tube Industries Ltd
Defendant
Azot Ltd
Defendant
Waseem Mehboob
Defendant
Parveen Saleemi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SM is entitled to performance fees and shares under alleged consultancy agreements
- 2 Whether SM is beneficial owner of shares acquired via nominees
- 3 Whether forged documents invalidate claims
Ratio Decidendi
All key contractual documents relied upon by SM for performance fees and share entitlement were forged; SM's claims based on those documents fail. However, SM made substantial contribution to purchase of nominee shares and is beneficial owner of KS and Mehboob shares. Loan deeds put forward by Defendants are not genuine and do not defeat SM's beneficial ownership. SM entitled to declaratory relief as beneficial owner. SM not liable for costs in Reventox action. SM entitled to damages for wrongful dismissal. MZ committed malicious falsehood by altering judgment on website; damages awarded are nominal.
Court Disposition
Claims for contractual performance fees and share bonuses dismissed; SM declared beneficial owner of KS and Mehboob shares; SM not liable for Reventox costs; SM awarded damages for wrongful dismissal; nominal damages for malicious falsehood.
Orders
- Declaratory relief that SM is beneficial owner of KS and Mehboob shares; PS and Mehboob hold shares on trust for SM.
- ISTIL Group to pay damages to SM for wrongful dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment