Mohammed Akrami v The Commissioners for HMRC
The Tribunal refused permission to admit the late appeals because the delays were serious and significant, there was no good reason for the delays, the appellant was professionally advised throughout, and the appeals had little merit. Finality and compliance with statutory time limits outweighed any prejudice to the appellant.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohammed Akrami; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Application for Permission to Notify Late Appeals
- Outcome
- Applications for permission to notify late appeals refused; appeals not admitted.
- Legal Topics
- Late Appeals, Penalties, Personal Liability Notices, Jurisdiction, Procedural Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Akrami
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Application for Permission to Notify Late Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant permission to admit late appeals in three tax penalty cases
- 2 Whether there was a good reason for the delay in filing the appeals
- 3 Whether the appeals have reasonable prospects of success
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused permission to admit the late appeals because the delays were serious and significant, there was no good reason for the delays, the appellant was professionally advised throughout, and the appeals had little merit. Finality and compliance with statutory time limits outweighed any prejudice to the appellant.
Court Disposition
Applications for permission to notify late appeals refused; appeals not admitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment