Belaid, R v

Belaid, R v

The ASBO was not necessary because the appellant would be on licence and subject to recall after release, providing sufficient protection against reoffending. The ASBO would likely only displace, not prevent, his criminal activity. The appellant's drug dependency, which drives his offending, would be addressed during his sentence, and licence conditions could be tailored to manage risk.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Mohammed Belaid
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (asbo)
Outcome
ASBO quashed; custodial sentence remains.
Legal Topics
Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo), Sentencing, Theft, Handling Stolen Goods
Criminal Law Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo) Sentencing Theft Handling Stolen Goods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Mohammed Belaid

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (asbo)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the imposition of an ASBO in addition to a custodial sentence was necessary and appropriate in the circumstances of the appellant's offences.

Ratio Decidendi

The ASBO was not necessary because the appellant would be on licence and subject to recall after release, providing sufficient protection against reoffending. The ASBO would likely only displace, not prevent, his criminal activity. The appellant's drug dependency, which drives his offending, would be addressed during his sentence, and licence conditions could be tailored to manage risk.

Court Disposition

ASBO quashed; custodial sentence remains.

Orders

  • The anti-social behaviour order is quashed.