R v Mohammed Danyal Imran
The sentencing judge properly applied the rape sentencing guidelines, gave sufficient weight to all aggravating and mitigating factors including the appellant's health and character, and the sentence of seven years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Mohammed Danyal Imran
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, Impact of Health Conditions on Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Mohammed Danyal Imran
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether sufficient allowance was made for the appellant's physical and mental health conditions
- 3 Whether the case should fall outside the sentencing guidelines due to exceptional circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge properly applied the rape sentencing guidelines, gave sufficient weight to all aggravating and mitigating factors including the appellant's health and character, and the sentence of seven years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence of seven years' imprisonment upheld
- 24 days of qualifying curfew to count towards sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment