R v Mohammed Hanif & Ors

R v Mohammed Hanif & Ors

No jury irregularity or bias occurred; convictions not inconsistent with acquittals; no unfairness or prejudice in trial; applications for leave to appeal refused as convictions are safe.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Mohammed Hanif; Applicant: Mohammed Nazam Nasser; Applicant: Amir Ali
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
applications for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Rape, Jury Irregularity, Loss of Time Orders, Appeal Against Conviction
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Rape Jury Irregularity Loss of Time Orders Appeal Against Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Mohammed Hanif

Applicant

Mohammed Nazam Nasser

Applicant

Amir Ali

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether jury irregularity rendered Hanif's conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether Nasser's conviction was inconsistent with acquittals on other counts
  3. 3 Whether Ali's conviction was inconsistent with acquittal and whether trial unfairness or prejudice occurred

Ratio Decidendi

No jury irregularity or bias occurred; convictions not inconsistent with acquittals; no unfairness or prejudice in trial; applications for leave to appeal refused as convictions are safe.

Court Disposition

applications for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • no loss of time order made for any applicant