Hussain v R

Hussain v R

Although the complainant’s credibility was central, her previous convictions were not of substantial probative value in the specific factual context, and their exclusion did not affect the safety of the conviction given the strength and consistency of the prosecution evidence.

Parties
Appellant: Mohammed Hussain; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Bad Character Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Witness Credibility
Criminal Law Rape Bad Character Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Witness Credibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Hussain

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to admit evidence of the complainant’s bad character under section 100 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether exclusion of the complainant’s previous convictions rendered the conviction unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

Although the complainant’s credibility was central, her previous convictions were not of substantial probative value in the specific factual context, and their exclusion did not affect the safety of the conviction given the strength and consistency of the prosecution evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed