Junaid, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1202 (06 September 2024)
The sentencing judge was entitled to move upwards from the starting point due to the scale and sophistication of the appellant's drug operation, and applied appropriate reductions for guilty plea and totality. The overall sentence was not manifestly excessive and was just and proportionate to the offending.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 1202
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Mohammed Junaid
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Driving Offences, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Mohammed Junaid
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether appropriate reductions were made for guilty plea and previous convictions
- 3 Whether sentences for driving offences should have been consecutive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to move upwards from the starting point due to the scale and sophistication of the appellant's drug operation, and applied appropriate reductions for guilty plea and totality. The overall sentence was not manifestly excessive and was just and proportionate to the offending.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment