UK Communications Ltd v Nahim & Anor
Mr Nahim and Resolutions, by failing to heed repeated HMRC warnings and facilitating payments to third parties outside the supply chain, dishonestly assisted Mr Meare in breach of fiduciary duty and participated in a conspiracy to divert funds from UK Communications. Their deliberate blindness and failure to carry out due diligence, combined with their absence from proceedings, establish liability for dishonest assistance and conspiracy.
- Parties
- Claimant: UK Communications Limited; Defendant: Mohammed Nahim; Defendant: Resolutions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Dishonest Assistance, Constructive Trust, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conspiracy, VAT Fraud, MTIC Fraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UK Communications Limited
Claimant
Mohammed Nahim
Defendant
Resolutions
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Nahim and Resolutions dishonestly assisted in breach of fiduciary duty by Mr Meare
- 2 Whether Mr Nahim and Resolutions are liable as constructive trustees for diverted funds
- 3 Whether there was an unlawful means conspiracy to defraud UK Communications
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Nahim and Resolutions, by failing to heed repeated HMRC warnings and facilitating payments to third parties outside the supply chain, dishonestly assisted Mr Meare in breach of fiduciary duty and participated in a conspiracy to divert funds from UK Communications. Their deliberate blindness and failure to carry out due diligence, combined with their absence from proceedings, establish liability for dishonest assistance and conspiracy.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Defence of Mr Nahim and Resolutions struck out under CPR Part 39.3.
- Judgment for UK Communications Limited against Mr Nahim and Resolutions jointly and severally for £93,699,309.84.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment