Qasimm, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1248 (04 September 2025)
The appeal was dismissed because the sentencing judge correctly applied the statutory starting point of 30 years for murder during a robbery, properly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors, and there was no evidence of particular immaturity to justify a reduction below the starting point. The appellant's youth and vulnerability were considered but did not outweigh the seriousness of the offence and other aggravating factors.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1248
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Mohammed Qasim
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (minimum Term)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Minimum Term, Sentencing, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Youth and Maturity in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Mohammed Qasim
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (minimum Term)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term of 30 years (less remand) for murder was manifestly excessive given the appellant's youth, vulnerability, lack of premeditation, and previous good character.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the sentencing judge correctly applied the statutory starting point of 30 years for murder during a robbery, properly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors, and there was no evidence of particular immaturity to justify a reduction below the starting point. The appellant's youth and vulnerability were considered but did not outweigh the seriousness of the offence and other aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment