Khan, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 440 (6 April 2017)

Khan, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 440 (6 April 2017)

The offence involved a significant degree of planning, organisation, and use of weapons, justifying its classification as a professionally planned commercial robbery at the lower end of seriousness. The sentencing judge properly exercised discretion in considering mitigation, and the sentence imposed was within the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Crim 440
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Mohammed Tahmid Khan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing, Offensive Weapons, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Robbery Sentencing Offensive Weapons Appeal Against Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Mohammed Tahmid Khan

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the offence was correctly categorised as a professionally planned commercial robbery under the Sentencing Council Robbery Definitive Guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the sentence properly reflected the appellant's personal mitigation and lack of previous convictions

Ratio Decidendi

The offence involved a significant degree of planning, organisation, and use of weapons, justifying its classification as a professionally planned commercial robbery at the lower end of seriousness. The sentencing judge properly exercised discretion in considering mitigation, and the sentence imposed was within the appropriate range.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.