Mahajna v London School Of Business And Finance & Anor

Mahajna v London School Of Business And Finance & Anor

The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge conducted the proceedings with scrupulous fairness, made no material errors of fact or law, exercised his discretion appropriately on interest and costs, and no procedural unfairness or injustice was established.

Parties
Appellant: Mones Mahajna; First Respondent: London School of Business and Finance (UK) Limited; Second Respondent: Finance and Business Training Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Damages Assessment, Procedural Fairness, Costs, Interest on Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mones Mahajna

Appellant

London School of Business and Finance (UK) Limited

First Respondent

Finance and Business Training Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's conduct resulted in procedural unfairness justifying a new trial
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge misunderstood the appellant's case or made material errors of fact
  3. 3 Whether the award of interest and its calculation was erroneous

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge conducted the proceedings with scrupulous fairness, made no material errors of fact or law, exercised his discretion appropriately on interest and costs, and no procedural unfairness or injustice was established.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed in full
  • No variation of quantum, interest, or costs orders below