Morelle Ltd v Wakeling [1955] EWCA Civ 1 (03 March 1955)
The Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decision in Morelle Ltd. v. Waterworth, which held that leasehold interests acquired by a foreign corporation in mortmain are forfeited to the Crown, and registration under the Land Registration Act, 1925 does not confer a good title in contravention of the Mortmain Acts. The previous decision was not given per incuriam as no relevant statute or binding authority was overlooked.
- Citation
- [1955] EWCA Civ 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Morelle Ltd.; Respondents: Waterworth and others; Amicus Curiae: Attorney-General (Crown); Respondents: Mr Gardiner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 1955
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mortmain, Foreign Corporations, Forfeiture, Registered Land, Stare Decisis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morelle Ltd.
Appellant
Waterworth and others
Respondents
Attorney-General (Crown)
Amicus Curiae
Mr Gardiner
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act, 1888 applies to leasehold interests held by foreign corporations
- 2 Whether registration under the Land Registration Act, 1925 confers a good title to a foreign corporation otherwise incapable of holding land in mortmain
- 3 Whether the previous Court of Appeal decision in Morelle Ltd. v. Waterworth was given per incuriam and can be reopened
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decision in Morelle Ltd. v. Waterworth, which held that leasehold interests acquired by a foreign corporation in mortmain are forfeited to the Crown, and registration under the Land Registration Act, 1925 does not confer a good title in contravention of the Mortmain Acts. The previous decision was not given per incuriam as no relevant statute or binding authority was overlooked.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs awarded to respondents as between party and party, taxed as between solicitor and client under the Schedule.
- Leave to appeal granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment