Morgan Trowland & Anor v R

Morgan Trowland & Anor v R

Given the high culpability, extensive planning, scale of disruption, previous convictions, and the need for deterrence, the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive or disproportionate. The judge made no material error of principle and properly balanced the appellants' rights with the public interest.

Parties
Appellant: Morgan Trowland; Appellant: Marcus Decker; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Public Nuisance, Sentencing, Protest Rights, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly, Deterrence, Proportionality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Morgan Trowland

Appellant

Marcus Decker

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed for public nuisance were manifestly excessive and/or a disproportionate interference with the appellants' rights under Articles 10 and 11 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in principle in his approach to culpability, mitigation, previous convictions, and deterrence

Ratio Decidendi

Given the high culpability, extensive planning, scale of disruption, previous convictions, and the need for deterrence, the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive or disproportionate. The judge made no material error of principle and properly balanced the appellants' rights with the public interest.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentences of three years' imprisonment for Morgan Trowland and two years and seven months' imprisonment for Marcus Decker upheld