Morge v Hampshire CC
The balance of convenience favours granting the variation because the risk of significant harm to wildlife is low and the risk of losing project funding is real and substantial. The evidence does not show likely significant impact on bats or badgers from the proposed works.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Morge; Respondent: Hampshire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application to Vary Interim Injunction Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Habitats Directive Compliance, Environmental Impact Assessment, Interim Relief, Planning Permission, Wildlife Protection
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morge
Applicant
Hampshire County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application to Vary Interim Injunction Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim injunction restraining works should be varied to allow preparatory works pending appeal
- 2 Whether the proposed works would cause significant harm to wildlife, particularly bats and badgers
- 3 Whether the risk of losing project funding justified varying the injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of convenience favours granting the variation because the risk of significant harm to wildlife is low and the risk of losing project funding is real and substantial. The evidence does not show likely significant impact on bats or badgers from the proposed works.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Variation of interim injunction to allow specified preparatory works pending appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment