R v Morteza Jodeiri-Lakpour

R v Morteza Jodeiri-Lakpour

The omission of a recent complaint direction did not render the conviction unsafe because the evidence of complaint was not used by the jury to resolve the disputed issue of intention, and the directions and summing up pointed the jury to focus on the direct evidence of the incident. The conviction was therefore safe.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Morteza Jodeiri-Lakpour; Complainant: Oksana Khylenko
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Threats to Kill, Recent Complaint Direction, Unsafe Conviction, Judicial Directions, Coercive Behaviour
Criminal Law Threats to Kill Recent Complaint Direction Unsafe Conviction Judicial Directions Coercive Behaviour

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Morteza Jodeiri-Lakpour

Appellant

Oksana Khylenko

Complainant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the failure to give a recent complaint direction rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether evidence of complaint was improperly used to support the prosecution case

Ratio Decidendi

The omission of a recent complaint direction did not render the conviction unsafe because the evidence of complaint was not used by the jury to resolve the disputed issue of intention, and the directions and summing up pointed the jury to focus on the direct evidence of the incident. The conviction was therefore safe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed