Mortgage Express v Butcher & Anor
Mortgage Express was refused an extension of time for appealing because it had initially confirmed it would not appeal, causing the respondent to rely on that assurance, and only sought to appeal after the deadline had expired and in a manner conditional on unrelated litigation, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Overriding Objective.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mortgage Express; 1st Respondent: Clinton James Butcher; 2nd Respondent: Anthony Martin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal—dismissal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Interests, Priority of Charges, Extension of Time for Appeal, Overriding Objective, Civil Procedure Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mortgage Express
Appellant
Clinton James Butcher
1st Respondent
Anthony Martin
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal—dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second respondent's equitable right to occupy the property has priority over the appellant's charge
- 2 Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time and permission to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Mortgage Express was refused an extension of time for appealing because it had initially confirmed it would not appeal, causing the respondent to rely on that assurance, and only sought to appeal after the deadline had expired and in a manner conditional on unrelated litigation, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Overriding Objective.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mortgage Express's application for extension of time for appealing is refused.
- Mortgage Express's application for permission to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment