Mortgage Express v Butcher & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 18 (24 January 2012)

Mortgage Express v Butcher & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 18 (24 January 2012)

Mortgage Express was refused an extension of time to appeal because it failed to comply with the procedural timetable, changed its position after the deadline, and caused prejudice and uncertainty to Anthony Martin, who was entitled to rely on their initial decision not to appeal. The interests of justice and the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules weighed against granting the extension.

Citation
[2012] EWCA Civ 18
Parties
Appellant: Mortgage Express; 1st Respondent: Clinton James Butcher; 2nd Respondent: Anthony Martin
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time and permission to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Equitable Rights of Occupation, Priority of Equitable Interests, Extension of Time for Appeal, Mortgagee Rights, Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Property Law Civil Procedure Equitable Rights of Occupation Priority of Equitable Interests Extension of Time for Appeal Mortgagee Rights Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mortgage Express

Appellant

Clinton James Butcher

1st Respondent

Anthony Martin

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the second respondent's equitable right to occupy the property has priority over the appellant's charge
  2. 2 Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time to appeal the lower court's order

Ratio Decidendi

Mortgage Express was refused an extension of time to appeal because it failed to comply with the procedural timetable, changed its position after the deadline, and caused prejudice and uncertainty to Anthony Martin, who was entitled to rely on their initial decision not to appeal. The interests of justice and the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules weighed against granting the extension.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time and permission to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Mortgage Express's application for extension of time to appeal is refused
  • Mortgage Express's application for permission to appeal is refused