Aldermore Bank Plc v Rana
Completion of the mortgage transaction required actual redemption of the prior Clydesdale charges. Since the mortgage advance was not used for this purpose and the charges remained undischarged, there was no completion, and Mr Rana was not contractually liable for the mortgage advance except for the sum paid to him.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Aldermore Bank PLC; Defendant/respondent: Nassir Rana
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Completion, Solicitor Undertakings, Trusts in Conveyancing, Remortgage Transactions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aldermore Bank PLC
Claimant/appellant
Nassir Rana
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mortgage transaction was completed so as to make Mr Rana liable for the mortgage loan and interest claimed
- 2 Whether the receipt of completion monies by the borrower's solicitors constituted completion of the mortgage transaction
- 3 Whether the mortgage advance ceased to be trust money before redemption of prior charges
Ratio Decidendi
Completion of the mortgage transaction required actual redemption of the prior Clydesdale charges. Since the mortgage advance was not used for this purpose and the charges remained undischarged, there was no completion, and Mr Rana was not contractually liable for the mortgage advance except for the sum paid to him.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr Rana is liable only for the sum of £78,193.64 paid to him; the Bank's claim for the balance of the mortgage advance is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment