Smith, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 361 (14 March 2024)

Smith, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 361 (14 March 2024)

The sentencing judge's refusal to adjourn for further psychiatric assessment was reasonable given the significant improvement in the appellant's mental health, the extensive prior assessments, and the absence of current evidence requiring a hospital order. The finding of high retained culpability was justified by the appellant's planning and conduct. The sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 361
Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Moses Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Diminished Responsibility, Hospital Orders, Dangerous Offender Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Moses Smith

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in refusing to adjourn for further psychiatric assessment under the Mental Health Act 1983
  2. 2 Whether the judge was wrong to find high retained culpability under the Manslaughter Sentencing Guideline

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge's refusal to adjourn for further psychiatric assessment was reasonable given the significant improvement in the appellant's mental health, the extensive prior assessments, and the absence of current evidence requiring a hospital order. The finding of high retained culpability was justified by the appellant's planning and conduct. The sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.