London Borough of Hackney, R (on the application of) v Rottenberg [2007] EWHC 166 (Admin) (24 January 2007)
The Crown Court was entitled to reject the opinion of the environmental health officers and to conclude, on the totality of the evidence, that the noise did not amount to a statutory nuisance to the criminal standard. The assessment of nuisance is a matter for the court's own judgment, not determinable solely by expert evidence.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 166 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: London Borough of Hackney; Defendant: Moshe Rottenberg
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Case Stated / High Court (administrative Court) Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Nuisance, Noise Abatement, Expert Evidence, Article 9 ECHR, Reasonable Excuse, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Hackney
Claimant
Moshe Rottenberg
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Case Stated / High Court (administrative Court) Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown Court was entitled to reject the opinion of environmental health officers that noise constituted a statutory nuisance
- 2 Whether Article 9 ECHR (freedom of religion) or reasonable excuse provided a defence to breach of abatement notice
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown Court was entitled to reject the opinion of the environmental health officers and to conclude, on the totality of the evidence, that the noise did not amount to a statutory nuisance to the criminal standard. The assessment of nuisance is a matter for the court's own judgment, not determinable solely by expert evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs awarded to the defendant (Moshe Rottenberg) against the claimant (London Borough of Hackney), to be paid within 28 days, subject to summary assessment as specified in the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment