G & K (children), Re

G & K (children), Re

The judge's decision to remove T from the mother's care and place him with the grandparents under a care order was a discretionary judgment made in light of all the evidence, including expert opinions and the risks identified. The judge did not materially misunderstand or misapply the expert evidence, nor fail to consider the child's attachment to the mother. The appeal court found no error justifying interference and dismissed the appeal.

Parties
Appellant: Mother; First Respondent: Portsmouth City Council (Local Authority); Second Respondent: T (the child) by his Children’s Guardian
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Care Order in Portsmouth County Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Child Residence, Parental Responsibility, Appeals
Family Law Child Protection Care Orders Child Residence Parental Responsibility Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mother

Appellant

Portsmouth City Council (Local Authority)

First Respondent

T (the child) by his Children’s Guardian

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Care Order in Portsmouth County Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in ordering removal of T from the mother's care to the grandparents under a care order
  2. 2 Whether the judge misunderstood or misapplied expert evidence, particularly that of Miss Lindon
  3. 3 Whether the judge failed to properly weigh the evidence of secure attachment between mother and child

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision to remove T from the mother's care and place him with the grandparents under a care order was a discretionary judgment made in light of all the evidence, including expert opinions and the risks identified. The judge did not materially misunderstand or misapply the expert evidence, nor fail to consider the child's attachment to the mother. The appeal court found no error justifying interference and dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Full care order for T to reside with maternal grandparents under the supervision of Portsmouth City Council
  • Mother to have supervised contact with T as per care plan