Re B (A child) (Fact-finding)
The judge's findings as to the perpetrator of B's injuries cannot stand due to flawed reasoning, failure to consider material evidence, compartmentalised assessment, and insufficient analysis; the process of elimination used was not supported by the totality of evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; First Respondent: Local Authority; Second Respondent: Father; Third Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding in Care Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for rehearing by another circuit judge.
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Fact Finding, Physical Injury to Child, Appeal, Judicial Reasoning, Evidence Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
Local Authority
First Respondent
Father
Second Respondent
Children's Guardian
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding in Care Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's findings as to the perpetrator of injuries to B were sustainable
- 2 Whether the judge evaluated evidence holistically or compartmentally
- 3 Whether the judge failed to consider material evidence and expert opinion
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's findings as to the perpetrator of B's injuries cannot stand due to flawed reasoning, failure to consider material evidence, compartmentalised assessment, and insufficient analysis; the process of elimination used was not supported by the totality of evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for rehearing by another circuit judge.
Orders
- Rehearing of fact-finding hearing ordered
- Case remitted to another circuit judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment