T (A Child)

T (A Child)

The judge's decision to dispense with the fact finding hearing was plainly wrong in principle as it failed to properly consider the necessity, proportionality, and fairness of such a hearing in light of the allegations and their impact on contact and welfare. The appeal was allowed and new case management directions were ordered before a different judge.

Parties
Subject Child: AB (A Child); Appellant: Mother; 1st Respondent: Father; 2nd Respondent: Children's Guardian
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Contact and Welfare / Appeal From Case Management Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Case Management, Fact Finding Hearings, Child Contact, Welfare of the Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AB (A Child)

Subject Child

Mother

Appellant

Father

1st Respondent

Children's Guardian

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Child Contact and Welfare / Appeal From Case Management Decision

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in dispensing with a fact finding hearing regarding allegations of abuse
  2. 2 Whether it was necessary, proportionate, or fair to abandon the fact finding hearing
  3. 3 Appropriate case management in private law children proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision to dispense with the fact finding hearing was plainly wrong in principle as it failed to properly consider the necessity, proportionality, and fairness of such a hearing in light of the allegations and their impact on contact and welfare. The appeal was allowed and new case management directions were ordered before a different judge.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Case management decision set aside
  • New case management directions ordered before a different judge