Re A
The judge was entitled to order supervised contact and a s91(14) order based on the mother’s behaviour and risks to the child; the combination does not impermissibly fetter progression to unsupervised contact, as leave to apply can be granted if circumstances change.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; 1st Respondent: Father; 2nd Respondent: Children’s Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Chelmsford County Court and Family Court, Orders Made on 20 May 2021, Appeal Heard 12 October 2021, Judgment Delivered 23 November 2021
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements, Supervised Contact, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Appeals, Parental Responsibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
Father
1st Respondent
Children’s Guardian
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Chelmsford County Court and Family Court, Orders Made on 20 May 2021, Appeal Heard 12 October 2021, Judgment Delivered 23 November 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in making a supervised contact order without provision for progression to unsupervised contact
- 2 Whether the combination of a supervised contact order and a s91(14) order impermissibly fetters movement towards unsupervised contact and a more natural relationship
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to order supervised contact and a s91(14) order based on the mother’s behaviour and risks to the child; the combination does not impermissibly fetter progression to unsupervised contact, as leave to apply can be granted if circumstances change.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- A to live with her father
- Mother to have professionally supervised contact with A for 6 hours every other weekend
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment