W (Minors) [1998] EWCA Civ 553 (26 March 1998)
Rule 4.23 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 applies only to documents actually filed with and held by the court; preparatory notes and working papers held by social workers are not covered and may be disclosed to the police without leave of the court. The assessment report, being filed with the court, requires leave for disclosure, which should be granted in the public interest for the police investigation. The lower court's exercise of discretion was flawed for failing to give sufficient weight to the public interest in prosecuting serious crime and inter-agency cooperation.
- Citation
- [1998] EWCA Civ 553
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; Fourth Respondent/cross Appellant: Chief Constable (Police); Respondent (neutral): Local Authority; First Respondent: Father; Third Respondents: Maternal Grandparents
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal (family Law Disclosure) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment on Appeal From Leeds County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Confidentiality, Public Interest Immunity, Inter Agency Cooperation, Children Act Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
Chief Constable (Police)
Fourth Respondent/cross Appellant
Local Authority
Respondent (neutral)
Father
First Respondent
Maternal Grandparents
Third Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal (family Law Disclosure) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment on Appeal From Leeds County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of rule 4.23 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 regarding disclosure of documents
- 2 Status and confidentiality of documents not filed with the court
- 3 Exercise of judicial discretion in granting leave to disclose documents to police
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 4.23 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 applies only to documents actually filed with and held by the court; preparatory notes and working papers held by social workers are not covered and may be disclosed to the police without leave of the court. The assessment report, being filed with the court, requires leave for disclosure, which should be granted in the public interest for the police investigation. The lower court's exercise of discretion was flawed for failing to give sufficient weight to the public interest in prosecuting serious crime and inter-agency cooperation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave granted to disclose the assessment report to the police
- No order as to costs, save legal aid taxation to include costs reasonably incurred by the Guardian ad Litem
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment