M (Children : Residency/Contact : No 3)

M (Children : Residency/Contact : No 3)

Children B and C should live with their mother, with supervised contact to father transitioning to unsupervised contact, no contact with paternal family, and costs awarded against grandmother due to her reprehensible conduct.

Parties
Applicant: Mother; First Respondent: Father; Second Respondent: Grandmother; Children's Guardian: Children's Guardian
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment With Directions and Costs
Outcome
Children to reside with mother; supervised contact with father to transition to unsupervised; no contact with paternal family; costs awarded against grandmother; grandmother discharged as party.
Legal Topics
Residence, Contact, Wardship, Costs, Parental Responsibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mother

Applicant

Father

First Respondent

Grandmother

Second Respondent

Children's Guardian

Children's Guardian

Procedural Posture

Family / Final Judgment With Directions and Costs

  1. 1 With whom the children should live
  2. 2 Basis of children's residence arrangement
  3. 3 Contact arrangements with father and extended family

Ratio Decidendi

Children B and C should live with their mother, with supervised contact to father transitioning to unsupervised contact, no contact with paternal family, and costs awarded against grandmother due to her reprehensible conduct.

Court Disposition

Children to reside with mother; supervised contact with father to transition to unsupervised; no contact with paternal family; costs awarded against grandmother; grandmother discharged as party.

Orders

  • Children to live with mother.
  • Supervised contact with father to continue in July.