K (A Child)), Re
The lower courts erred in law by treating the application for equal division of time and for a shared residence order as indivisible, contrary to established legal principles. The welfare of the child supported making a shared residence order, even though the division of time remained unequal. The appeal was allowed and a shared residence order was made.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Father; Respondent: Mother
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children / Second Appeal to the Court of Appeal From Taunton County Court, Following Dismissal of Appeal From Yeovil County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Shared Residence Orders, Children Act 1989, Parental Responsibility, Contact Arrangements, Welfare Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Applicant/appellant
Mother
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children / Second Appeal to the Court of Appeal From Taunton County Court, Following Dismissal of Appeal From Yeovil County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a shared residence order requires equal division of the child's time between parents
- 2 Whether the lower courts erred in law by treating the application for equal time and shared residence as indivisible
- 3 Whether the welfare of the child required a change in the current arrangements
Ratio Decidendi
The lower courts erred in law by treating the application for equal division of time and for a shared residence order as indivisible, contrary to established legal principles. The welfare of the child supported making a shared residence order, even though the division of time remained unequal. The appeal was allowed and a shared residence order was made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Order of the circuit judge set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment