F (Children), Re
The trial judge did not misdirect himself or improperly fetter his discretion. He considered all relevant factors, including the children's objections, welfare, and protective measures available in Hungary. The process was not fundamentally unfair, and the appellate court cannot interfere with the judge's decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; Appellant: L (child); Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention, Child's Objections, Discretion in Summary Return, Children's Participation in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
L (child)
Appellant
Father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected himself by fettering his discretion in ordering summary return under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the judge failed to consider all relevant factors in exercising discretion
- 3 Whether the process was fundamentally unfair to the child L by not allowing her to participate or provide evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge did not misdirect himself or improperly fetter his discretion. He considered all relevant factors, including the children's objections, welfare, and protective measures available in Hungary. The process was not fundamentally unfair, and the appellate court cannot interfere with the judge's decision.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Children to be returned to Hungary
- Father's undertakings regarding interim custody and consent order in Hungary to be included in the order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment