Re C (A Child) (Child Abduction: Parent’s refusal to return with child)
The judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the mother would return to France with the child if ordered, and her Article 13(b) claim was not established. Oral evidence was not required, and the fallback plan for the child to live with the paternal aunt was sufficiently considered. The appeal was dismissed and the return order stands.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention, Article 13(b), Summary Return, Parental Refusal, Protective Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
Father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother's refusal to return with the child to France establishes a grave risk under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the judge erred in finding the mother would return to France if ordered
- 3 Whether oral evidence from the mother was required
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the mother would return to France with the child if ordered, and her Article 13(b) claim was not established. Oral evidence was not required, and the fallback plan for the child to live with the paternal aunt was sufficiently considered. The appeal was dismissed and the return order stands.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order for return of the child to France stands
- Steps to repatriate the child to France to be taken
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment