W (Children)
The appeal was allowed because the judge's conclusion that the mother and children could be adequately rehoused in London was unsupported by evidence, and the wishes and feelings of the children were not given sufficient weight. The financial arrangements proposed by the father were inadequate to maintain the standard of living, and the welfare balance favored relocation to Sweden.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mother; Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Application and Ancillary Relief / Appeal From Principal Registry of the Family Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Relocation of Children, Welfare of Children, Ancillary Relief, Contact Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Applicant
Father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act Application and Ancillary Relief / Appeal From Principal Registry of the Family Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother should be permitted to relocate the children to Sweden
- 2 Whether the wishes and feelings of the children were adequately considered
- 3 Whether financial arrangements for housing and maintenance were sufficient
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the judge's conclusion that the mother and children could be adequately rehoused in London was unsupported by evidence, and the wishes and feelings of the children were not given sufficient weight. The financial arrangements proposed by the father were inadequate to maintain the standard of living, and the welfare balance favored relocation to Sweden.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to relocate the children to Sweden granted
- Written submissions on implementation and costs invited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment