Re A and B (Children) (Summary Return: Non-Convention State)
The judge was entitled to make a summary welfare determination without a fact-finding hearing on domestic abuse allegations, having sufficiently considered all relevant factors, including the absence of relocation jurisdiction, children's wishes, and protective measures. The welfare analysis was not materially flawed and the summary return order was justified.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mother; Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Return, Non Convention State, Domestic Abuse, Child Welfare, Relocation, Fact Finding Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mother
Appellant
Father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge failed to comply with guidance in Re NY and Practice Direction 12J regarding domestic abuse allegations
- 2 Whether a fact-finding hearing was required before ordering summary return to a non-Convention State
- 3 Whether the welfare analysis was flawed, including consideration of relocation jurisdiction and children's wishes
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to make a summary welfare determination without a fact-finding hearing on domestic abuse allegations, having sufficiently considered all relevant factors, including the absence of relocation jurisdiction, children's wishes, and protective measures. The welfare analysis was not materially flawed and the summary return order was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Summary return order upheld
- Return of children to Dubai in care of mother
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment