Y-M (A Child)
The judge's reliance on Dr Ahmad's report was misplaced as Dr Ahmad had not read the CAFCASS report, undermining the basis for departing from CAFCASS recommendations. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for proper investigation.
- Parties
- Subject: Y-M (A Child); Appellant: Mother; Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Anger Management, CAFCASS Report, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Y-M (A Child)
Subject
Mother
Appellant
Father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in departing from CAFCASS recommendations regarding anger management and supervised contact
- 2 Whether Dr Ahmad's report was sufficient to justify commencement of contact
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's reliance on Dr Ahmad's report was misplaced as Dr Ahmad had not read the CAFCASS report, undermining the basis for departing from CAFCASS recommendations. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for proper investigation.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Case remitted to Reading County Court for expedited hearing before a different judge
- CAFCASS Officer to collaborate with Dr Ahmad and provide supplemental report
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment