Artcrafts International SpA v Mou Ltd [2024] EWHC 1558 (KB) (21 June 2024)
MOU has breached the Licence Agreement by supplying products into the exclusive territory (including the USA), operating its website and Google Ads to advertise and sell in the territory, and failing to take reasonable steps to safeguard Artcrafts' exclusive rights. The contractual construction advanced by Artcrafts is strongly arguable and there is more than a serious issue to be tried. Damages would not be an adequate remedy for Artcrafts due to the difficulty of quantification, reputational harm, and risk of further breaches. MOU's past and ongoing conduct, and its refusal to give undertakings, justify continuation of the interim injunction until trial. The USA is admitted to be within...
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1558 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Artcrafts International SpA; Defendant: MOU Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute (interim Relief, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Declaration) / Return Date Hearing for Continuation of Interim Injunction; Summary Judgment/strike Out Application; Judgment on Admission
- Outcome
- Interim injunction continued until trial or further order; summary judgment and declaration granted regarding USA territory; strike out of unsustainable defences ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Exclusive Licence Agreements, Breach of Contract, Summary Judgment, Declaratory Relief, Interpretation of Commercial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Artcrafts International SpA
Claimant
MOU Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute (interim Relief, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Declaration) / Return Date Hearing for Continuation of Interim Injunction; Summary Judgment/strike Out Application; Judgment on Admission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether MOU breached the exclusive licence agreement by supplying products into the exclusive territory (including the USA)
- 2 Proper construction of Clauses 2.1.1 and 7.1.1 of the Licence Agreement regarding exclusivity and reasonable endeavours
- 3 Whether interim injunctive relief should be continued until trial
Ratio Decidendi
MOU has breached the Licence Agreement by supplying products into the exclusive territory (including the USA), operating its website and Google Ads to advertise and sell in the territory, and failing to take reasonable steps to safeguard Artcrafts' exclusive rights. The contractual construction advanced by Artcrafts is strongly arguable and there is more than a serious issue to be tried. Damages would not be an adequate remedy for Artcrafts due to the difficulty of quantification, reputational harm, and risk of further breaches. MOU's past and ongoing conduct, and its refusal to give undertakings, justify continuation of the interim injunction until trial. The USA is admitted to be within...
Court Disposition
Interim injunction continued until trial or further order; summary judgment and declaration granted regarding USA territory; strike out of unsustainable defences ordered.
Orders
- MOU restrained from directly or indirectly manufacturing, distributing, selling, advertising or promoting the Products in the Territory (including the USA)
- MOU restrained from supplying Products to any person, firm or company known to distribute, advertise, promote, sell or otherwise dispose of Products in the Territory (including the USA)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment