Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A & Ors [2003] EWHC 259 (QB) (26 February 2003)
Sections 28(2) and (3) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 do not apply where the husband did not consent to the use of another man's sperm and the embryo was created as a result of a fundamental mistake contrary to the written consents. Therefore, Mr A is not the legal father of the twins; Mr B, as the biological father, is the legal father. The Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 8 ECHR do not require a different result, as domestic family law remedies (such as residence orders or adoption) are available to protect the welfare and rights of the children and Mr and Mrs A.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 259 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Defendant: Mr A; Defendant: Mrs A; Defendant (by Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor): YA; Defendant (by Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor): ZA; Defendant: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; Defendant: Mr B; Defendant: Mrs B; Intervenor: Department for Work and Pensions and the Department of Health (Intervenor); Advocate to the Court: Advocate to the Court (Attorney General)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Proceedings (parentage, Family Law) / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Declaration that Mr A is not the legal father refused; no declaration of incompatibility made; application of Mr B for declaration of parentage adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Parentage, Assisted Reproduction, Consent in Medical Procedures, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, Children Act 1989, Human Rights Act 1998, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Claimant
Mr A
Defendant
Mrs A
Defendant
YA
Defendant (by Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)
ZA
Defendant (by Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
Defendant
Mr B
Defendant
Mrs B
Defendant
Department for Work and Pensions and the Department of Health (Intervenor)
Intervenor
Advocate to the Court (Attorney General)
Advocate to the Court
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Proceedings (parentage, Family Law) / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr A is to be treated as the legal father of twins born as a result of a mistake in IVF treatment under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
- 2 Whether sections 28(2) or 28(3) of the 1990 Act apply to confer legal parentage on Mr A
- 3 Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 8 ECHR require a different result or render the 1990 Act incompatible with Convention rights
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 28(2) and (3) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 do not apply where the husband did not consent to the use of another man's sperm and the embryo was created as a result of a fundamental mistake contrary to the written consents. Therefore, Mr A is not the legal father of the twins; Mr B, as the biological father, is the legal father. The Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 8 ECHR do not require a different result, as domestic family law remedies (such as residence orders or adoption) are available to protect the welfare and rights of the children and Mr and Mrs A.
Court Disposition
Declaration that Mr A is not the legal father refused; no declaration of incompatibility made; application of Mr B for declaration of parentage adjourned.
Orders
- Application for declaration that Mr A is the legal father refused.
- No declaration of incompatibility under section 4 Human Rights Act 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment