Miranda Investments Limited & Ors v Abraham (Avi) A Dodi & Ors

Miranda Investments Limited & Ors v Abraham (Avi) A Dodi & Ors

Summary judgment is granted against the Claimants on the claims for the £500,000 withdrawal, the 24% return, rescission and damages in lieu of rescission, the loan to pay back investors, and the claim for rent, as these claims have no real prospect of success or are vested in the liquidator. The misrepresentation and breach of contract claims regarding the alleged £1m investments by the 3rd and 4th Defendants, and the buy-back agreement claims, have a real prospect of success and are not suitable for summary judgment or strike out. Claims against the 1st and 2nd Defendants under the misrepresentation claim are dismissed as they were not parties to the SA. The limitation period for...

Parties
Claimant: Miranda Investments Limited; Claimant: MaraVest Limited; Claimant: Fiona Childerstone; Claimant: Fabrice Triboix; Claimant: Jayshri Patel; Claimant: NJP Holdings Limited; Claimant: Rashwan Limited; Claimant: Savvas Efthimiou; Claimant: Ivor Tillier; Defendant: Mr Abraham (Avi) A Dodi; Defendant: Ms Nicole Sue Bremner; Defendant: Ordan UK Limited; Defendant: RTR Property Developments Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery, Business and Property) / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in part for Defendants; certain claims to proceed to trial.
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Shareholders’ Agreements, Limitation Periods, Exclusion Clauses
Contract Law Equity Company Law Misrepresentation Breach of Contract Summary Judgment Strike Out Shareholders’ Agreements +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miranda Investments Limited

Claimant

MaraVest Limited

Claimant

Fiona Childerstone

Claimant

Fabrice Triboix

Claimant

Jayshri Patel

Claimant

NJP Holdings Limited

Claimant

Rashwan Limited

Claimant

Savvas Efthimiou

Claimant

Ivor Tillier

Claimant

Mr Abraham (Avi) A Dodi

Defendant

Ms Nicole Sue Bremner

Defendant

Ordan UK Limited

Defendant

RTR Property Developments Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (chancery, Business and Property) / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants' claims should be struck out or subject to summary judgment under CPR 3.4(2) and/or CPR 24.2(a)
  2. 2 Whether the pleadings disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claims
  3. 3 Whether the claims for misrepresentation, breach of contract, rescission, damages in lieu, and buy-back agreements have realistic prospects of success

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment is granted against the Claimants on the claims for the £500,000 withdrawal, the 24% return, rescission and damages in lieu of rescission, the loan to pay back investors, and the claim for rent, as these claims have no real prospect of success or are vested in the liquidator. The misrepresentation and breach of contract claims regarding the alleged £1m investments by the 3rd and 4th Defendants, and the buy-back agreement claims, have a real prospect of success and are not suitable for summary judgment or strike out. Claims against the 1st and 2nd Defendants under the misrepresentation claim are dismissed as they were not parties to the SA. The limitation period for...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted in part for Defendants; certain claims to proceed to trial.

Orders

  • Summary judgment against Claimants on claims for £500,000 withdrawal, 24% return, rescission, damages in lieu of rescission, loan to pay back investors, and rent.
  • Summary judgment for 1st and 2nd Defendants on misrepresentation claim.