Boynton & Anor v Willers
The construction of the bay windows was not included in the original contract quotation, as evidenced by the absence of reference in the quotation and the parties' intentions at the time. The judge's award of damages for inconvenience, though low, was not so unreasonable as to warrant appellate interference given the evidence. The costs order was within the judge's discretion due to the overlap of issues and the appellants' conduct.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr and Mrs Boynton; Respondent: Willers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Building Contracts, Damages for Defective Workmanship, Costs, Set Off, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs Boynton
Appellant
Willers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the construction of bay windows was included in the original contract quotation
- 2 Appropriate measure of damages for defective works and inconvenience
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in the award of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The construction of the bay windows was not included in the original contract quotation, as evidenced by the absence of reference in the quotation and the parties' intentions at the time. The judge's award of damages for inconvenience, though low, was not so unreasonable as to warrant appellate interference given the evidence. The costs order was within the judge's discretion due to the overlap of issues and the appellants' conduct.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The appellants to pay the respondent's costs on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment