Aedifice Partnership Ltd v Shah [2010] EWHC 2106 (TCC) (10 August 2010)
Mr Shah made a clear and effective reservation of his position on jurisdiction, which he maintained throughout the adjudication. There was no express or implied agreement that the adjudicator could decide his own jurisdiction. Therefore, the adjudicator's decision is not enforceable against Mr Shah.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2106 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Aedifice Partnership Limited; Defendant: Mr Ashwin Shah
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Adjudication Enforcement Claim / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdictional Objections, Contract Formation, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aedifice Partnership Limited
Claimant
Mr Ashwin Shah
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Adjudication Enforcement Claim / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute
- 2 Whether there was a contract between Aedifice and Mr Shah
- 3 Whether an effective reservation of jurisdiction was made by the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Shah made a clear and effective reservation of his position on jurisdiction, which he maintained throughout the adjudication. There was no express or implied agreement that the adjudicator could decide his own jurisdiction. Therefore, the adjudicator's decision is not enforceable against Mr Shah.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Aedifice's claim for summary judgment is dismissed
- Aedifice to pay Mr Shah's costs, summarily assessed at £5000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment