Mad Atelier International BV v Manes

Mad Atelier International BV v Manes

No issue estoppel arises from the Paris Commercial Court judgment because French law does not recognise issue estoppel, the parties are not privies, the relevant findings were not final or conclusive, and the issues in the English proceedings are broader. There is no abuse of process as the English proceedings are not a collateral attack, the exclusive jurisdiction clause entitles the claimant to sue in England, and the claims have a real prospect of success. No case management stay is justified as there are no exceptional circumstances and the exclusive jurisdiction clause must be respected.

Parties
Claimant: MAD Atelier International B.V.; Defendant: Mr Axel Manès
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application (strike Out/summary Judgment/case Management Stay) / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Applications dismissed
Legal Topics
Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Summary Judgment, Case Management Stay, Jurisdiction Clauses, Res Judicata
Civil Procedure Contract Law Conflict of Laws Issue Estoppel Abuse of Process Summary Judgment Case Management Stay Jurisdiction Clauses +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MAD Atelier International B.V.

Claimant

Mr Axel Manès

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Application (strike Out/summary Judgment/case Management Stay) / Interlocutory Application Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Paris Commercial Court judgment give rise to issue estoppel in the English proceedings?
  2. 2 Are the English proceedings an abuse of process (collateral attack or Henderson v Henderson abuse)?
  3. 3 Do the claims have a real prospect of success or should they be summarily dismissed?

Ratio Decidendi

No issue estoppel arises from the Paris Commercial Court judgment because French law does not recognise issue estoppel, the parties are not privies, the relevant findings were not final or conclusive, and the issues in the English proceedings are broader. There is no abuse of process as the English proceedings are not a collateral attack, the exclusive jurisdiction clause entitles the claimant to sue in England, and the claims have a real prospect of success. No case management stay is justified as there are no exceptional circumstances and the exclusive jurisdiction clause must be respected.

Court Disposition

Applications dismissed

Orders

  • Application to strike out dismissed
  • Application for summary judgment dismissed