B v B
The District Judge’s decision to award the wife 40% of the net value of the shares upon realisation, rather than a lump sum based on present value, was justified by the unusual inability to transfer shares, the matrimonial origin of the asset, and the need to recognise both parties’ contributions. The exercise of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr B; Respondent: Mrs B
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Financial Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Clean Break, Valuation of Shares, Post Separation Accrual
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr B
Appellant
Mrs B
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Judge erred in ordering a percentage share of future realisation of shares rather than a lump sum based on present value
- 2 Whether the District Judge misapplied legal principles regarding valuation and division of assets acquired during marriage but realised post-separation
- 3 Whether the absence of a clean break was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The District Judge’s decision to award the wife 40% of the net value of the shares upon realisation, rather than a lump sum based on present value, was justified by the unusual inability to transfer shares, the matrimonial origin of the asset, and the need to recognise both parties’ contributions. The exercise of discretion was appropriate and not shown to be wrong.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- District Judge’s order upheld
- Wife to receive 40% of net value of shares upon realisation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment