Solad Sakandar Mohammed & Ors v Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji & Ors
The objective intention of the donors and lenders was that the funds were to be held by the London trustees for the benefit of the London Tablighi Jamaat community, not for the Dewsbury Trust. The 1996 Declaration of Trust, though executed later than its date, validly constituted the trust in accordance with the donors' intentions. The 1998 and 1999 documents signed under pressure did not alter the trust. D14 was validly removed as trustee due to refusal to act.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Solad Sakandar Mohammed; Claimant: Mr Ibrahim Ahmed Shaikh; Claimant: Mr Molvi Noorul Haque; Defendant: Mr Bostan Mohammed; Defendant: Mr Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Abdul Muqit; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Umair Zulfiqar; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Shaikir Alam; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Zahid Mahmood; Defendant: Mr Yasir Mumtaz; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Esa Mansuri; Defendant: Mr Mehboob Khan; Defendant: Mr Mohammed Ishaq Chaudhry; Defendant: Mr Abdul Mumin Choudhury; Defendant: Abdul Hussein Choudhury; Defendant: Awlad Ali; Defendant: Zulfiqar Ali; Defendant: His Majesty's Attorney General; Defendant: Mushtaq Mohammed; Defendant: Hisham Hassan Mohamed Shar Lala; Defendant: Muhammad Anisuz Zaman Chowdhury; Defendant: Asif Jawad; Defendant: Mohammed Hayat Khan; Defendant: Suhel Abdul Samad Bholat; Defendant: Yusuf Mohamed Seedat; Defendant: Abdul Malik; Defendant: Usman Abdullah Munshi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (charity/trusts) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Trusts, Cy Près Doctrine, Trustee Removal, Intention of Donors, Ownership of Religious Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Solad Sakandar Mohammed
Claimant
Mr Ibrahim Ahmed Shaikh
Claimant
Mr Molvi Noorul Haque
Claimant
Mr Bostan Mohammed
Defendant
Mr Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Abdul Muqit
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Umair Zulfiqar
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Shaikir Alam
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Zahid Mahmood
Defendant
Mr Yasir Mumtaz
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Esa Mansuri
Defendant
Mr Mehboob Khan
Defendant
Mr Mohammed Ishaq Chaudhry
Defendant
Mr Abdul Mumin Choudhury
Defendant
Abdul Hussein Choudhury
Defendant
Awlad Ali
Defendant
Zulfiqar Ali
Defendant
His Majesty's Attorney General
Defendant
Mushtaq Mohammed
Defendant
Hisham Hassan Mohamed Shar Lala
Defendant
Muhammad Anisuz Zaman Chowdhury
Defendant
Asif Jawad
Defendant
Mohammed Hayat Khan
Defendant
Suhel Abdul Samad Bholat
Defendant
Yusuf Mohamed Seedat
Defendant
Abdul Malik
Defendant
Usman Abdullah Munshi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (charity/trusts) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 What was the objective intention of donors and lenders who contributed £1.4 million for the purchase of Abbey Mills Mosque?
- 2 Were the purchase monies held for the purpose of the London trustees or for the Dewsbury Trust?
- 3 What is the legal effect and timing of the 1996 Declaration of Trust?
Ratio Decidendi
The objective intention of the donors and lenders was that the funds were to be held by the London trustees for the benefit of the London Tablighi Jamaat community, not for the Dewsbury Trust. The 1996 Declaration of Trust, though executed later than its date, validly constituted the trust in accordance with the donors' intentions. The 1998 and 1999 documents signed under pressure did not alter the trust. D14 was validly removed as trustee due to refusal to act.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration that the Land is held upon the trusts of the 1996 Declaration of Trust for the benefit of the London Tablighi Jamaat community.
- Declaration that D14 was validly removed as trustee and replaced by C3.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment