H-C (Children)
The trial judge's reasoning was internally inconsistent, failed to adequately explain reliance on expert and neighbour evidence, and improperly conflated evidence of lies with proof of smothering; fresh evidence further undermined reliability of key witnesses. The finding of deliberate smothering cannot stand and must be set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr C; First Respondent: Lancashire County Council; Second Respondent: Children's Guardian; Third Respondent: Mother of A, K, J
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fact Finding, Care Proceedings, Child Death, Expert Evidence, Appeal, Credibility Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr C
Appellant
Lancashire County Council
First Respondent
Children's Guardian
Second Respondent
Mother of A, K, J
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's finding of deliberate smothering was justified on the evidence
- 2 Whether the judge's reasoning was internally consistent and adequately explained
- 3 Whether reliance on neighbour evidence and assessment of expert evidence was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's reasoning was internally inconsistent, failed to adequately explain reliance on expert and neighbour evidence, and improperly conflated evidence of lies with proof of smothering; fresh evidence further undermined reliability of key witnesses. The finding of deliberate smothering cannot stand and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Finding of deliberate smothering by Mr C set aside
- No re-trial in Family Court prior to criminal trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment