C (Children), Re

The applicant's argument that it was not unreasonable for him to bring the application is reasonably arguable, crossing the threshold for permission to appeal.

Parties: Appellant: Mr C; Respondent: Mrs C
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 24 March 2006
Procedural Posture: Family / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome: permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics: Costs Orders, Appeals, Unreasonable Conduct

Family Law Costs Orders Appeals Unreasonable Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr C

Appellant

Mrs C

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the costs order made in family proceedings was justified on grounds of unreasonable conduct
2 Whether permission to appeal the costs order should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's argument that it was not unreasonable for him to bring the application is reasonably arguable, crossing the threshold for permission to appeal.

Court Disposition

permission to appeal granted

Orders

Permission to appeal the costs order is granted.