Hall v Harris & Ors
Mr Hall's right of common is exercisable every third year, not annually, based on historical evidence and custom. Ancillary rights include bringing vehicles onto the land only if necessary for animal welfare, and the right to remove noxious weeds with notice. Mr Hall is entitled to access Luckwards Hill through gates B and C and two gates between the portions of the common. Damages for removal of hay are limited to nominal damages due to lack of evidence of actual loss.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Colin Hall; Respondent: Gerald Harris; Respondent: Mrs Cynthia Harris; Respondent: Mrs Shirley Moore
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rights of Common, Grazing Rights, Ancillary Rights, Access to Common Land, Damages for Trespass
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Colin Hall
Appellant
Gerald Harris
Respondent
Mrs Cynthia Harris
Respondent
Mrs Shirley Moore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Hall's right of common is exercisable every year or only one year in three
- 2 Scope of ancillary rights (use of vehicles, cutting/removal of weeds)
- 3 Entitlement to access Luckwards Hill via specific gates
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Hall's right of common is exercisable every third year, not annually, based on historical evidence and custom. Ancillary rights include bringing vehicles onto the land only if necessary for animal welfare, and the right to remove noxious weeds with notice. Mr Hall is entitled to access Luckwards Hill through gates B and C and two gates between the portions of the common. Damages for removal of hay are limited to nominal damages due to lack of evidence of actual loss.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Revised declarations substituted regarding ancillary rights, weed removal, and access through gates B and C and two gates between portions of the common
- Nominal damages of £5 awarded to Mr & Mrs Harris for removal of hay
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment