- v - (London : Liability to pay an administration charge) [2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_LAC_2013_0029 (19 March 2014)

- v - (London : Liability to pay an administration charge) [2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_LAC_2013_0029 (19 March 2014)

The tribunal determined that the applicants are not liable to pay the administration charge as the lease does not expressly provide for such liability.

Citation
[2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_LAC_2013_0029
Parties
Applicant: Mr D Abrahams; Applicant: Mr C Tinker; Respondent: Mr
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Administration Charge Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Administration Charges, Leasehold Liability
Property Law Administration Charges Leasehold Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr D Abrahams

Applicant

Mr C Tinker

Applicant

Mr

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administration Charge Dispute / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 liability to pay administration charge under lease

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined that the applicants are not liable to pay the administration charge as the lease does not expressly provide for such liability.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Applicants are not liable to pay the administration charge.