Daniel Beech v Avon Fire and Rescue Service
The Employment Judge erred by drawing a conclusion about the timing of the claimant's knowledge of relevant facts without hearing evidence or submissions on that point, which was a relevant consideration in the exercise of discretion on the amendment application. The matter should be remitted to the same Employment Judge to reconsider the amendment application in light of the correct factual position.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Daniel Beech; Respondent: Avon Fire and Rescue Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and remitted
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Direct Discrimination, Indirect Discrimination, Case Management, Amendment of Pleadings, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Daniel Beech
Appellant
Avon Fire and Rescue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Judge erred in refusing an amendment application to add a direct discrimination claim
- 2 Whether the Employment Judge erred in striking out the direct discrimination claim for having no reasonable prospect of success
- 3 Whether the Employment Judge failed to consider relevant evidence or submissions regarding the timing of disclosure to the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Judge erred by drawing a conclusion about the timing of the claimant's knowledge of relevant facts without hearing evidence or submissions on that point, which was a relevant consideration in the exercise of discretion on the amendment application. The matter should be remitted to the same Employment Judge to reconsider the amendment application in light of the correct factual position.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and remitted
Orders
- The appeal succeeds to the extent indicated.
- The matter is remitted to the same Employment Judge to reconsider the amendment application regarding direct discrimination in light of the timing of disclosure to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment