Edem v Ajilon (UK) Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 394 (30 March 2007)

Edem v Ajilon (UK) Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 394 (30 March 2007)

The orders of HHJ McMullen QC were sensible case management directions in a complex procedural context, and there was no proper basis for granting permission to appeal as no error of law was demonstrated.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Civ 394
Parties
Appellant: Mr E. A. E. Edem; Respondent: Ajilon (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Fujitsu Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Case Management, Strike Out Applications, Appeals Procedure, Interlocutory Orders
Employment Law Civil Procedure Case Management Strike Out Applications Appeals Procedure Interlocutory Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr E. A. E. Edem

Appellant

Ajilon (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Fujitsu Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the case management orders of HHJ McMullen QC warranted permission to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the adjournment and stay periods were appropriate
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was deprived of an oral hearing on the Rule 3(10) application

Ratio Decidendi

The orders of HHJ McMullen QC were sensible case management directions in a complex procedural context, and there was no proper basis for granting permission to appeal as no error of law was demonstrated.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused on both applications