Edem v Ajilon (UK) Ltd & Anor

Edem v Ajilon (UK) Ltd & Anor

There was no proper basis to grant permission to appeal against the case management directions of HHJ McMullen QC, as they were sensible and did not deprive the appellant of any substantive rights, including the right to an oral hearing if appropriate.

Parties
Appellant: Mr E. A. E. Edem; Respondent: Ajilon (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Fujitsu Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Case Management, Strike Out Applications, Appeals Procedure
Employment Law Civil Procedure Case Management Strike Out Applications Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr E. A. E. Edem

Appellant

Ajilon (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Fujitsu Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the case management orders of HHJ McMullen QC warranted permission to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was deprived of an oral hearing under Rule 3(10)
  3. 3 Whether interlocutory appeals had any merit after the substantive strike out

Ratio Decidendi

There was no proper basis to grant permission to appeal against the case management directions of HHJ McMullen QC, as they were sensible and did not deprive the appellant of any substantive rights, including the right to an oral hearing if appropriate.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Applications for permission to appeal refused.