E Williams v The Information Commissioner
The First-tier Tribunal gave adequate and intelligible reasons for finding Mr Williams' request vexatious, considering the context of multiple previous similar requests and the lack of public value in disclosure during an ongoing investigation. The absence of a prior Tribunal balancing decision on public interest did not require further explanation. There was no error of law.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr E Williams; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Vexatious Requests, Public Interest Test, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr E Williams
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by failing to explain why a request with a serious and genuine underlying purpose was vexatious in the absence of any earlier Tribunal determination balancing public interests for and against disclosure of similar information held by the IOPC.
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal gave adequate and intelligible reasons for finding Mr Williams' request vexatious, considering the context of multiple previous similar requests and the lack of public value in disclosure during an ongoing investigation. The absence of a prior Tribunal balancing decision on public interest did not require further explanation. There was no error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is upheld; the appeal is dismissed under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment